The Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program and the Purpose of Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v17i1.187226Keywords:
higher education, neoliberalism, financial aid, united statesAbstract
This case study investigates the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (PSLF), a policy designed to enable student debt forgiveness after ten years of payments for individuals working in public service. The program has only forgiven a small number of loans; as of this writing less than 34% of people who have applied for the program have actually received loan forgiveness. What does this low number indicate about the program and the perception of higher education in the contemporary United States context? To answer that question, in this article, we review the history of the program, the scholarship about PSLF, and analyze its implementation using the tools of document analysis and critical policy analysis. We argue that the failure of the program communicates a clear message about the purpose of higher education in the United States under a neoliberal paradigm.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saralyn McKinnon-Crowley, Sarah Harris

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Critical Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


