Performing Wild Time
Workshopping Friendship as Critical Autoethnographic Paraversity Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v11i1.186454Keywords:
critical autoethnography, friendship as method, paraversity, corporate academy, neoliberalism, mentoringAbstract
The focus of this autoethnographic paper is on its authors’ experiences of running a conference workshop on Friendship as Method in Paraversity scholarship development. Using the workshop sequence as a framework and context for the paper enables a developing focus on a key emerging analytic issue. This is the tensions around the conception, use and management of time between the Paraversity and the corporate academy. The authors show how friendship-based relations can be crucial for personal and academic thriving in promoting critical sensibilities and reflexivity. They argue, however, that, because it is normally associated with ineffective and unproductive time use, friendship is neither sufficiently encouraged nor taken seriously as a methodological topic in the corporate academy. Moreover, the corporate management of time and relations can inhibit the friendship-mediated development of critical and creative academics, the expansion and exploration of knowledge, and creative ways of generating knowledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Critical Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).