Critical Discourse Analysis of Quality in Early Care and Education Navigating Politicized Landscapes
Main Article Content
Abstract
Early care and education (ECE) is vital for children's development, yet educators navigate a politically charged environment marked by debates over curriculum and equity. Recent issues like book bans and diversity initiatives highlight ECE as a site of ideological conflict, where political agendas often overshadow children's needs. This paper critiques the evolving discourse on ECE quality through a social constructionist lens and critical discourse analysis. It reveals that current quality definitions favor standardization and economic goals at the expense of the complexities of early education. The study advocates for a more inclusive and compassionate approach that supports all children's holistic development. Using the "ECE trilemma" model, it examines affordability, availability, and quality within the ECE landscape. Ultimately, the paper challenges narrow views of quality, urging a redefined discourse that prioritizes the diverse needs of children and families while empowering educators. It calls for collaborative efforts to move beyond compliance to a comprehensive understanding of quality that emphasizes human development.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.