Main Article Content
This article examines how the pandemic related work from home experience differed between two groups of university workers: those for whom working at home was new and those with experience working predominantly from home. Survey responses collected from approximately 6,000 employees from seven universities in Canada are analyzed to measure productivity, satisfaction, and stress across four determinants of successful work from home arrangements, including: the nature of the job, attributes of the worker, support of the employer, and domestic responsibilities. The results support the contention that all four determinants must be satisfied for home working to succeed. While prior experience with work from home leads to greater durability in those four realms, it is not sufficient to sustain them regardless of circumstance. For instance, we find compelling evidence that for all university employees, having a child dependent and being the primary care provider predicts diminished productivity and augments stress, and an additional penalty (higher stress) is observed for women. We synthesis our findings with emerging studies concerning sudden shock in stable employment environments in the larger change management literature.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).