On the Importance of Collaborative Peer Learning as a Collective Learning Experience in Finnish Higher Education Classrooms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v5i16.184565Keywords:
Neoliberalism, Direct-Action Pedagogy, Collaborative Learning, Sociological Imagination, Critical DialogueAbstract
This article discusses the need for collaborative learning in higher education as a means to advance a moral democracy in the classroom and in the community as well as the role of the neoliberal state in the commodification of knowledge and how this commodification has related to Finnish higher education. The transformation in Finnish education from the traditional Nordic model to the neoliberal model has stifled debate, deliberation and collaboration in the classroom. University students’ (N=150) evaluations that were given to the teacher after teaching thirteen courses in English reading comprehension and English oral skills in 2012-2013 formed the data of this study. The feedback was analyzed through qualitative content analysis by categorizing the answers according to the themes of meaningful learning experiences, abilities of critical thinking, and opinions on collaborative learning. As a conclusion, a direct-action pedagogy to counter the banking concept of education is stressed.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Critical Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).